-- Advertisement --

-- Advertisement --

Canadian Art

Review

Janet Jones: Viva Las Vegas

MacLaren Art Centre, Barrie Mar 4 to May 23 2010
Janet Jones (from left) <i>DaDa Flow #1</i> 2006  <i>DaDa Flow #3</i> 2006 <i>DaDa Delirio #4</i> 2009 Installation view  /  photo Toni Hafkenscheid  Janet Jones (from left) DaDa Flow #1 2006 DaDa Flow #3 2006 DaDa Delirio #4 2009 Installation view / photo Toni Hafkenscheid

Janet Jones (from left) <i>DaDa Flow #1</i> 2006 <i>DaDa Flow #3</i> 2006 <i>DaDa Delirio #4</i> 2009 Installation view / photo Toni Hafkenscheid

We make space, and in the making of it we hover at the edge of safety and terror. There are few more poignant states of the human condition that can become the subject of art, and of painting in particular. For painting, this edge lies between the certainty of its own objecthood and its paradoxical receptiveness to illusion, a relationship that extends to its dual investment in the external world of entities and the interior world of reflected impressions.

In Janet Jones’ recent exhibition “DaDa Delirium” at the MacLaren Art Centre, a selection of works from 2003 to 2010, the artist tested this relationship against the “delirium” that Las Vegas conjures up, a reference made explicit in A Las Vegas of the Mind #1 and #2. Basing this body of work on a photographic research trip, Jones focused on what Vegas does best—the fabrication of an illusory world of light and shadow, a film noir of desire and deceit. In the paintings that follow on these photographs, the anonymity of public space becomes a mask or veil rendering incidental and indecipherable all activity caught within its lens. Like a mask, this anonymous space beckons us, calling out to us that whatever we do, whatever we desire can be obtained.

And yet we know otherwise. Like the double gaze in Hitchcock’s rear-view mirror, the apparent solidity of place yields to the indeterminacy of perception, a subjective space in which the incidental and indecipherable actions of the viewer, and the multiplicities of image experienced by the body’s movement through space and time, subvert the security of anonymity. Paul Virilio writes about the role of double exposure in early film, where it was deployed as a sort of reflective palimpsest over the character’s face to suggest their inner thoughts, fears and feelings. In “DaDa Delirium,” Jones replaced the film character with the viewing subject, elaborating a sense of anxious alienation through an array of mirror reflections and subliminal, elusive imagery, a flickering sensation that seems inescapably our own.

But knowing otherwise is not to know only fear, and Janet Jones has no interest in moral lessons. In a painterly tour de force, Jones applies soft pastel and fluorescent colours to the edges of the paintings, and even in some cases intrudes delicately into the severe white-and-black tonality of the image. Under proper gallery lighting, the subtlety of this colour intervention works not as an addition to the imagery, but as a framing device, a glow surrounding the painting whose effect is to deliver to the viewer an illuminated familiarity, an intimacy that folds together anonymity and anxiety, solid form and inchoate space, enabling us to stand on the brink, to give definition to the intangible.

Such is the manner by which Janet Jones takes on the simultaneity of reality and illusion in painting, constructing for the viewer a hyperreality, a space defined by each individual, with one’s emotive state charging the void of anonymity. The critical threshold of control and its loss that Jones paints for us here suspends us in that moment of allure as light becomes form and form slips into a lightness radiating outward beyond the outer edges of the painting, like the last lights of Las Vegas before the darkness of the desert night swallows up their promise.

It would be easy to imagine that Jones’ Las Vegas reference should invoke a forum of judgment. Ecstasy and despair run through the history of both Las Vegas and modern art. But as I’ve suggested, these paintings provide no safe haven; rather, they evoke the midnight thrill of a world reduced to the interpenetration of light and dark, poising us on the fulcrum that divides the space we occupy from the projected space into which we long to fall. This is the new sublime—not the face of nature we know from Caspar David Friedrich, but the face of human nature confronted by the consequences of our own ambivalence. The distance separating Friedrich and Jones is the distance seen in that rear-view mirror.

This article was first published online on June 24, 2010.

RELATED STORIES

  • Frances Thomas: Natural Abstraction

    There’s many ways of looking at paintings. But as reviewer Terrence Heath observes at Frances Thomas’ current exhibition, sometimes the best way to look is simply the longest—an approach that allows Thomas’ sense of the infinite to shine through.

  • Janet Jones

    Janet Jones’s paintings are a sensory delight. They appear to be composed of forms that are tightly constrained, but then expand beyond this immediate experience to offer a full visual effect that is very physical. Volumes push out into the viewer’s space from the dark linear shapes that seem to hold them, moving both toward us and also laterally across the canvases, generating an almost magical optical effect.

  • Rewind: Sara Angelucci

    Memory is fragile and that is its beauty. Throughout her career, Sara Angelucci has been fascinated by the subject of memory and its relationship to photography. ...Fall 2004

 

FOUNDATION NEWS

More Foundation news

ONLINE

  • Jon Rafman: Mapping Google

    Jon Rafman’s work enjoys a deservedly high profile at this year’s Contact Festival. As Saelan Twerdy observes in this review, Rafman’s stunning, and often funny, Google Street View scenes demonstrate how the Internet is making everything public, from information to intimacy.

  • Spring Auctions: Going Once, Going Twice…

    The auction record for contemporary Canadian art was broken earlier this month in New York with Christie’s $3.6 million sale of a Jeff Wall photograph. This week, Canada’s top houses head into their spring sales hoping to break more records.

  • Keren Cytter: Video Virtuoso

    “Based on a True Story” in Oakville boasts the largest North American survey to date of Keren Cytter, the Tel Aviv–born artist known as one of today’s most intriguing video practitioners. Mariam Nader reviews, finding greatest hits and unexpected delights.

  • Sovereign Acts: Painful Histories, Terrific Performances

    The history of indigenous people performing for colonial audiences inspires "Sovereign Acts,” a current Toronto group show. As Max Mosher writes, the show—featuring Lori Blondeau, Adrian Stimson and others—is both campy and contemplative.

  • Dil Hildebrand: In the Green Room

    Dil Hildebrand is one brave painter. In his new show “Back to the Drawing Board (Reprise),” he stares down the old adage that no one wants to look at a green painting, let alone buy one. There's not just one green painting here—there's a room of them.

More Online

- Advertisements -



- Advertisements -
Report a problem